#49
Remote Governance Testing - motion #94
Executed
This is a remote governance testing.
We would like to use Crab's governance system to manage Crab Parachain.
The batch call's detail is:
- Transferring
100CRAB from Treasury to theSourceRootaccount - Send a remote call to force transfer
100CRAB on the Crab Parachain side
Why do we choose force_transfer?
Because it is easy to verify the result.
Edited
Reply
Up
This vote has been closed.
Business
Link to
Hash
0xfc1464cf5e80204cb1c6dfabc673b36f433c13d94177f590bec7e4b04e67d58b
Threshold
SimpleMajority
Metadata
Proposer
Index
49
Threshold
4
Hash
0x49b07d5e5a6ed10a8a85c397ef81cf118c4b971c6820ce1b7c366d38d7f41166
Call
Table
Json
| callIndex | 0x2407 | ||||||
| section | democracy | ||||||
| method | fastTrack | ||||||
| args |
|
TimelineLatest activity undefined
Comments
Who is the holder of https://crab-parachain.subscan.io/account/5Cz5SFixm4CWBiwvYySNMhkmw1aDhSMVgj7kcxuve1Nw3v8N
Is he OK with this force_transfer test.
Reply
Up
For review of remote governance message call https://polkadot.js.org/apps/?rpc=wss%3A%2F%2Fcrab-parachain-rpc.darwinia.network%2F#/extrinsics/decode/0x190105020028b4a5e67767ec4aba8e8d99ac58481ec74e48185507f1552b1f8ba00994cf5900b4f7f03bebc56ebe96bc52ea5ed3159d45a0ce3a8d7f082983c33ef13327474717000010632d5ec76b05
Reply
Up